<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Deepak Kumar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deepak.im/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deepak.im</link>
	<description>Deepak Kumar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 03:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New Age Of Article Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.deepak.im/?p=1</link>
		<comments>http://www.deepak.im/?p=1#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 05:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Deepak Kumar</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deepak.im/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ll admit it: my SEO strategies leaned a little too heavily on article marketing in the past. It was tempting, it was easy, and it was pure SEO. The old trick was pretty simple: there were dozens of “article directories” &#8230; <a href="http://www.deepak.im/?p=1">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I’ll admit it: my SEO strategies leaned a little too heavily on article marketing in the past. It was tempting, it was easy, and it was pure SEO.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The old trick was pretty simple: there were dozens of “article directories” online, which would pay somewhere between “A pittance” and “$0? for 300 words or so of content, which could include a link. They took care of the hard part:  building a trusted site that could rank for the long-tail terms that showed up in the articles, and would pass link-juice along with traffic.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Google’s “Farmer” update didn’t end that process, but it definitely changed it. The first reactions assumed that Google was going after the big content farms — i.e. the biggest of all, Demand Media’s eHow.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But once search analytics firm Systrix collected some data on “farmer”, a different picture emerged: while some sites had been slammed, article marketing stalwart EzineArticles lost 90% of its traffic, and Yahoo!’s Associated Content lost even more, the big names were largely unscathed. Demand’s eHow actually rose slightly, although some of their other properties dropped.<br />
What Does “Farmer” Mean for SEOs?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">“Farmer” means that doing article marketing the easy way is over. You can no longer treat low-level content production as a commodity, and crank up the dial in order to achieve rankings. Not only did many content farms lose rankings, but they responded by raising quality requirements and implementing no-followed links. Not only will you get a smaller audience, but you’ll have to invest more to get it.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But here are a few tricks SEOs can use to deal with the effects of “Farmer”:</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Target the top content sites. eHow is still ranking well, and still delivers traffic. Youtube also benefited from the latest rankings change; it’s not hard to create a one-minute video around each of twenty different long-tail terms, which could easily rank on page one.<br />
Reemphasize social media. Facebook was one of the top beneficiaries from this change. But more importantly, social media as a whole may benefit in a relative sense: you can’t get into the universal search results as easily, so getting into the stream and the newsfeed may be the next-best option. A few possibilities:<br />
Instead of five generic articles, write one compelling (and re-tweetable) piece of linkbait.<br />
On Facebook, don’t just “own” your business name. Try to own a mid-tail keyword, too.<br />
Find out which “sharing” icons your users click on; ditch the rest.<br />
Start emailing. If you can’t own the SERP and you’re already at maximum capacity in the stream, you need to own the inbox.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Here’s the good news: thanks to Google’s “farmer” update, there’s a surplus of writers online; now’s a great time to figure out what they’re best for, now that arbitraging Google’s domain authority isn’t an option.<br />
The Best Response: Outsourcing Your Low-Quality Content, Again</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">For marketers running long-standing campaigns, there’s another dead-simple option: instead of taking a risk on Google’s algorithm, why not pay someone else to? In other words, why not use contextually targeted ads to drag those lower-quality clicks over to your own site?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It’s hard to beat eHow on skill or scale. They can produce more articles than you, faster than you, for less money. They’ll probably get better placement. And they have a better idea of what people are searching for, and what searches are trending.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Instead of trying to rank #1, it might be more economical to just pay the #1 ranker (via Adsense site targeting) for the traffic you would have gotten organically. Better to pay for traffic than to pay for a failed attempt at ranking.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">(This goes against the white-hat SEO ethos of building long-lasting assets. But try combining it with the strategies above: acquire traffic through Adsense on eHow and other sites, then turn those one-time visitors into loyal newsletter subscribers or Twitter followers, who can then spread your higher-quality content around in their own social networks.)<br />
What Should Article Directory Owners Do?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Article directories need to pivot slightly. There’s still room for the same basic business model: writing individual pieces of rankable content is a completely different business from building a trusted site, so it makes sense that these would be done by two different groups.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">One path for article directory owners is to target a single vertical or a single audience, and write some of their own high-quality content while selling others the right to add their own pieces. For example, instead of building a generic article directory about mortgages, a savvy article directory owner could launch a personal finance blog written by a professional, with occasional guest blog posts from someone who has a reputation in that area. This site could pay for authoritative guest blog posts, then get paid for low-authority guest blog posts (i.e. the ones that would have shown up on an article directory), either directly or through ads.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The beauty of this strategy is that it’s pretty Google-friendly, too. It’s still building high-quality content, and it’s using domain authority in a sensible fashion.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">This strategy follows the golden rule of white hat SEO, which the “farmer” update confirmed: optimize your site for the smarter search engine of the future — because that future is coming sooner than you expect.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Opinions expressed in the article are those of the guest author and not necessarily Search Engine Land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deepak.im/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

